Skip to content

Llama 3.1 8B vs Phi-4 14B

Comparing VRAM requirements, performance, and capabilities for running these models locally with Ollama.

Parameters

8B

Context

128K

VRAM Range

6.3–18 GB

Recommended

Q8_0 (10 GB)

By Meta · License Llama 3.1 Community License
Parameters

14B

Context

16K

VRAM Range

9.9–16 GB

Recommended

Q4_K_M (9.9 GB)

By Microsoft · License MIT

VRAM Requirements by Quantization

Side-by-side memory needs at each quality level.

Quantization Llama 3.1 8B Phi-4 14B Difference
Q4_K_M 6.3 GB 9.9 GB -3.6 GB
Q8_0 10 GB 16 GB -6.0 GB
F16 18 GB

Capabilities

Feature support comparison.

Capability Llama 3.1 8B Phi-4 14B
text generation Yes Yes
code generation Yes Yes
multilingual Yes
tool use Yes
summarization Yes Yes
reasoning Yes
math Yes

Benchmark Scores

Higher is better. Scores from published evaluations.

Benchmark Llama 3.1 8B Phi-4 14B
mmlu 73.0 84.8

Hardware Compatibility

Can each model run at recommended quantization on common VRAM tiers?

VRAM Llama 3.1 8B Phi-4 14B
8 GB Offload Offload
12 GB Runs Runs
16 GB Runs Runs
24 GB Runs Runs
32 GB Runs Runs
48 GB Runs Runs
64 GB Runs Runs
96 GB Runs Runs

Run Llama 3.1 8B

ollama run 8b-instruct-q8_0

Run Phi-4 14B

ollama run 14b-q4_K_M

Check your exact hardware

Use the compatibility checker to see how each model performs on your specific GPU or Mac.

Related Comparisons